posted at twelve:00 pm on April 17, 2011 by Rovin
printer-friendly FBI shuts down best on-line poker internet web sites rapidly following DC OKs its very own internet web site

Coincidence? Or Chicago-style robust arming with the Federal Authorities? Or each?

Just days immediately right after Washington D.C. approves on-line poker gambling, the Justice Division, FBI palms out indictments to a number of crucial online poker sites charging them with financial institution fraud, income laundering and unlawful gambling offenses. (through The Hill)

“Executives at PokerStars, Total Tilt Poker and Absolute Poker transpire for being charged with lender fraud and income laundering.  The FBI shut down three in the largest poker internet sites Friday in what appears to get the largest crackdown on illegal on the internet gambling thus far.  Eleven executives at PokerStars, Complete Tilt Poker and Absolute Poker have been charged with economic institution fraud, funds laundering and unlawful gambling offenses. Prosecutors are attempting to get to promptly shut down the web-sites and recuperate $3 billion by means of the companies.”

A connected L.A. Days tale explains how “the bust” went down, the outcomes amid on the web gamblers, as well as ramifications through the Federal regulation handed in 2006 beneath the route of then Senate Majority Leader Invoice Frist when he additional the measure to some port safety bill.

“The FBI had shut down two online web sites, Complete Tilt Poker and PokerStars, by Friday evening and ended up working to do specifically precisely the same using the third, Absolute Poker. On-line internet site guests ended up greeted which incorporates a idea declaring, “This domain name has been seized with the F.B.I. pursuant to an Arrest Warrant,” and an enumeration of federal anti-gambling statutes and penalties.

An estimated 8 million to 10 million Americans play poker online for funds; thousands of them earn their living online websites, according to some players advocacy group.

Congress tried to shut down the industry by enacting an anti-gambling regulation in 2006, but most internet sites found ways to work around the vaguely worded measure. Since then other members of Congress have proposed bills to legalize Internet gambling, but they have failed to reach a floor of either chamber.

“These defendants concocted an elaborate criminal fraud scheme, alternately tricking some U.S. banks and effectively bribing others to assure the continued flow of billions in unlawful gambling profits,” Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney in Manhattan, said in a statement.

The 2006 regulation did not directly outlaw online poker web sites, but instead barred businesses from taking payments for “unlawful” on the internet gambling, leaving the definition of what is unlawful to others.”

And Invoice Frist motives have been certainly questionable at the time, still leaving on-line gambling internet pages wondering how the law was to become interpreted:

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, in pushing the measure through Congress as part of a port protection bill just prior to adjournment last weekend, seemed more intent on pleasing social conservatives than truly gutting on-line gambling.

Joseph Kelly, a legislation professor at Buffalo (NY) State College and an attorney for within the net gaming concerns, calls the regulation “highly unenforceable.” The act makes it illegal for banks to transfer income from customer accounts to online gambling companies. But for the most part, bettors don’t pay their on the web bookies directly. Payments usually are routed to offshore companies by means of an online intermediary such as Canadian-based Neteller, the largest money-transfer firm in this sphere. In addition, American banking lobbyists insisted that the most basic form of payment be exempted if the industry was to support the regulation. That’s the good old-fashioned check — the two paper and electronic versions — whose volume made them impossible to monitor. So checks are exempted.

Fast forward to the new king of “legal” online poker:

The District is becoming the first U.S. jurisdiction to allow Web gambling, looking to raise millions of dollars from your habits of on the internet poker buffs and acting ahead of traditional gambling meccas like New Jersey and Nevada.  Permitting the on the web games was part of your 2011 budget and a 30-day period for Congress to object expired last week, said D.C. Council member Michael A. Brown, who authored the provision. The gaming would be operated by Intralot, a Greek company, and would be available only to gamblers within the borders with all the District.

……………The move to legalize the games comes despite a 2006 federal regulation that effectively banned World wide web gambling. The legislation basically prohibited banks and credit card companies from processing payments from gambling companies to individuals. But the legislation is murky, and gambling experts say it created enough grey areas to open the door for a deeper expansion into the multibillion dollar industry.

“There was really no clear legislation that said we could not do this,” Brown said Wednesday. D.C. hopes to tap those millions to help offset budget cuts and help social services programs, Brown said.

Jeff Ifrah, a lawyer whose firm represents on the web gaming companies, said he was dubious about any revenue estimates since they naturally assume that on the web poker players will migrate from their favorite net page into a new one endorsed by a state.  “Players are really loyal in this industry,” Ifrah said. “You really have to ask yourself what is the incentive a player is going to have to leave a trusted website with global competition to play in a web-site that’s untested and kind of unknown and doesn’t offer you a similar level of play.”  (emphasis mine)

Oh boy, the “incentive” was initiated with the whole thrust using the DOJ at the same time as FBI, who are playing their hand just like a skilled poker player. But, has D.C. stacked the deck?   The whole “deal” reeks of Federal Cronyism, and I’d “bet” others are asking questions about the timing in the FBI bust, and who else might have been “sitting at the table”.

Related tale by way of Hot Air December 8, 2010 by Ed Morrissey—Harry Reid is either fuming over these developments or might are already nicely aware of them—who knows?

This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments about the original post, look here.